Methodology · 5 min read
TAM/SAM/SOM Market Sizing
TAM/SAM/SOM Market Sizing is a way of estimating a market in three nested layers: the total addressable market, the part you can serve, and the share you can realistically win.
Summarised from Steve Blank, Bob Dorf and Bill Gurley · View sources ↓At a glance
- Use this when
- You need a defensible estimate of how big a market or segment is before choosing targets, setting goals or making an investment case.
- What you will work towards
- A bottom-up market size for the total, serviceable and obtainable market, with sources and assumptions.
- Bring to the reading
- A specific decision from your work and the customer evidence you have so far.
What it is
A way of estimating how big a market is in three nested layers. Total addressable market (TAM) is the revenue available if every possible customer for this kind of solution bought it. Serviceable addressable market (SAM) is the part of TAM your product can actually serve today, given its features, geography, price point and channels. Serviceable obtainable market (SOM) is the share of SAM you can realistically win in a set period, usually three years, given your competition and go-to-market capacity. No single person invented the approach; it grew out of venture capital and start-up practice, and Steve Blank and Bob Dorf's The Startup Owner's Manual is one of the best-documented versions. The layers matter because each answers a different question: TAM tells leadership whether the opportunity is worth pursuing at all, SAM tells PMM which segments to target, and SOM sets a realistic revenue goal. The most reliable method builds the numbers from the bottom up (number of target customers multiplied by what each would pay) rather than taking a percentage of a large analyst figure.
When to use it
- Choosing between segments in STP targeting, where each candidate segment needs a size estimate before you compare attractiveness.
- Building an investment case for a new product, a new vertical or international expansion, where leadership or investors will ask how big the prize is.
- Setting annual or three-year revenue goals for a product line, so targets rest on the number of reachable customers rather than last year's growth plus a percentage.
- A board deck or fundraising round quotes a top-down market figure that nobody in the business can explain or defend.
- Comparing growth options (for example, in an Ansoff Matrix or BCG Growth-Share Matrix review), where each option needs a sized market so risk and reward can be compared.
How to run it
- Define the customer and the problem precisely. Write one sentence naming who buys, what problem the product solves, and what counts as a sale. "Mid-sized UK accountancy firms buying practice management software" can be sized; "SMBs that need productivity" cannot.
- Build TAM from the bottom up. Count every organisation (or person) that has the problem, using public business registers, industry associations, LinkedIn company counts or census data. Multiply by the annual contract value a typical customer would pay. Record every source.
- Cross-check with a top-down estimate. Find an analyst or industry figure for the category and compare it with your bottom-up TAM. A gap of more than about two times means one of your assumptions is wrong; investigate before moving on.
- Narrow to SAM. Remove customers you cannot serve today: the wrong geography, the wrong size, missing integrations, required compliance you lack, or a channel you do not have. Each cut should be a named, sourced filter.
- Estimate SOM. Apply a realistic share of SAM for the next three years based on evidence: your current win rate, sales capacity, marketing reach, and how many competitors split the market. A new entrant claiming more than a low single-digit share of SAM in three years needs strong evidence.
- Document assumptions and ranges. Present a low, central and high case, with the two or three assumptions that move the number most. Leadership needs to see which assumptions to test.
- Feed the numbers into decisions. Use SAM by segment in STP targeting, SOM in revenue planning and goal setting, and TAM in investment cases.
- Refresh when inputs change. Update the model when pricing changes, when the product opens a new segment, or at least once a year in planning.
Cadence & ownership
PMM commonly runs market sizing at early and growth-stage companies, because it holds the segmentation, pricing and competitive inputs. At a scaled company, a strategy, finance or market research team often owns the official model, with PMM supplying segment definitions and validating assumptions against customer evidence; finance usually signs off any figure used in an investor or board document. A full model takes one to three weeks the first time. Refresh it annually during planning, and whenever pricing, target segments or geography change.
Example
Fictional dental practice software company Smilebook wanted to expand from the UK into Germany. The board deck quoted a European dental software market of €2.1 billion from an analyst report. The PMM rebuilt the number from the bottom up. A count from public registers came to roughly 40,000 German dental practices (all figures in this example are illustrative); at Smilebook's average contract of €3,600 a year, that gave a German TAM of about €144 million. Removing practices with more than ten chairs (which needed features Smilebook lacked) and practices tied into long contracts with the two dominant local vendors left a SAM of about 14,000 practices, or €50 million. Based on Smilebook's UK win rate of 18% in competitive deals, a planned sales team of six, and a 30-month ramp, the PMM estimated a three-year SOM of 3% of SAM, or about €1.5 million in annual recurring revenue. Leadership cut the German revenue target from €6 million to €2 million, focused the launch on practices with two to eight chairs, and hit €1.7 million in year three.
Pitfalls
- Leading with a top-down figure. Taking 1% of a huge analyst number produces a figure nobody can defend and that hides who the customers are. Recovery: build bottom-up first, then use the analyst figure only as a cross-check.
- Anchoring TAM to today's spending. Products that make a job cheaper or easier can grow the market well beyond current spend, a point Bill Gurley made in 2014 about early valuations of Uber that sized it against the existing taxi market. Recovery: size TAM on the number of customers with the problem and what they would pay, and show a separate case for market expansion if you expect one.
- Treating SOM as a goal rather than an estimate. Teams pick an ambitious share and work backwards, so SOM stops reflecting capacity or competition. Recovery: derive SOM from win rates, sales capacity and reach, and make any stretch goal a separate, labelled number.
How the ideas connect
Choose where to go next
Make it useful
Bring it back to your work.
Name one decision this guide could help you make. Write down the evidence you need, the output you would produce, and how you would know it was useful.
Check your understanding
Practise applying TAM/SAM/SOM Market Sizing in five short scenarios.
5 practical scenarios. Choose an answer, explore the reasoning, and revisit the guide whenever you need.
Sources
- Steve Blank & Bob Dorf, The Startup Owner's Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company (K&S Ranch, 2012; Wiley edition), a well-documented version of the TAM, SAM and target-market breakdown; the approach has no single originator.
- Bill Gurley, "How to Miss By a Mile: An Alternative Look at Uber's Potential Market Size", Above the Crowd (2014), on why sizing a new product against the existing market's spend can badly underestimate TAM.
← All entries in Market & Customer Understanding · Try the category quiz · Edit on GitHub